Reeder: Job licensing not what it appears in Illinois
By Scott Reeder firstname.lastname@example.org January 3, 2014 9:16PM
Updated: February 6, 2014 6:16AM
During the decades I’ve covered government, I’ve seen a steady stream of people arrive in Springfield wanting to have their occupation licensed.
And as of Wednesday, the state began licensing yet another — condominium managers.
They join a litany of workers such as hair braiders, interior decorators, barbers, auctioneers and others that are regulated by the state of Illinois.
There are some who would have you believe that government bureaucrats are like perched vultures waiting for some unsuspecting entrepreneur to come along before they swoop in. The reality is something a bit more interesting.
Regulation often is the product of a chummy relationship between elected officials and those in business who want to cut down on their competition to maximize profits. So every year, a parade of folks in various vocations come to the state Capitol asking for their fields to be licensed and regulated.
And it usually works like this: Have the state require extensive training for those wanting to enter the field, and exempt everyone already in the field from the new regulations by “grandfathering” them.
By doing this, those in the profession can create an artificial shortage of “licensed” individuals. This reduces the supply of people who can do the job and enables those still in the field to be paid more.
That, of course, means that the rest of us pay more for their services.
Yes, there are some professions such as physicians, dentists for which it makes sense to require a license. But frankly, I couldn’t care less if my barber has been OK’d by the state.
If I’m not pleased with a haircut, I’ll go to someone else the next time. That’s how the free market regulates things.
Or how about interior designers? What would constitute a gross license violation?
Improper use of the word “mauve?” Shag carpeting in the basement rec room? Beaded doorway curtains? Macramé potholders?
We should be encouraging entrepreneurship and self-reliance, not stifling it.
For example, if a single mom on my street wanted to make a few extra bucks cutting neighbor kids’ hair in her basement, her initiative should be a reward. She shouldn’t be punished.
But too often, professional licensing is about protecting turf, not the public.
In a 2012 report, the Institute for Justice noted that it costs $671 in fees to be an Illinois auctioneer and 45 days of training are also required. Auctioneering wasn’t a licensed profession in Illinois until about 2000.
Somehow the state managed to have plenty of successful auctions long before it began licensing auctioneers. Somebody must have done a lot of fast talking in Springfield to get them licensed.
Barriers such as these hurt low-income people by creating obstacles for them to enter certain fields. It hurts the rest of us by reducing competition and increasing the costs of the services those vocations offer.
That’s why the best regulator of professions is the consumer — not state bureaucrats. Let the free market work.
Scott Reeder is a veteran statehouse reporter and the journalist-in-residence at the Illinois Policy Institute, a nonprofit research group that supports the free market and limited government.