Sarah Jessica Parker launches shoe line worthy of Carrie Bradshaw
By Jocelyn Noveck March 4, 2014 4:12PM
NEW YORK, NY - FEBRUARY 28: Sarah Jessica Parker introduces her new shoe collection SJP at Nordstrom Pop-Up Shop on February 28, 2014 in New York City. (Photo by Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for Nordstrom)
Updated: April 6, 2014 6:10AM
NEW YORK — Quick, what’s your favorite “Sex and the City” moment involving Carrie Bradshaw and her adored shoe collection?
Was it the time she got mugged, and the mugger specifically demanded her Manolo Blahniks? “Somebody stop him!” she cried out. “He took my strappy sandals!”
Or perhaps the time another pair of Manolos was stolen because, annoyingly, the hostess at a baby shower demanded that everyone take off their shoes?
Well, “Sex and the City” ended in 2004, and Carrie — er, actress Sarah Jessica Parker — has just launched her own shoe line, SJP, which also includes handbags, at Nordstrom. (Her business partner is George Malkemus, CEO of Manolo Blahnik; SJP shoes are cheaper than Manolos — in the $300 range.) Parker makes a stop Friday (4:30 to 5:30 p.m.) at Nordstrom at the Michigan Avenue-based Shops at Northbridge. (An SJP Collection purchase is required to meet Parker.)
The 48-year-old actress, who’s had previous forays into the fashion business, but not a shoe line, recently talked about the new project, fashion, how she really did have her Manolos stolen, and the possibility of a third “Sex and the City” movie, hinting (very) obliquely at a possible ending to Carrie’s story.
Q. So how did this all get started?
A. Well, I was very kindly being offered a lot of opportunities in the shoe category and I kept rejecting them. And I couldn’t figure out why. ... And I was sitting with some women friends of mine and they said to me, “What is it?” And I said, “Well, I know it’s not going to be the shoe that I want it to be.” And I said that really my dream partner is George Malkemus. And they said, “Have you asked him?”
Q. You actually did have Manolos stolen once?
A. Yes, I really did. ... All my luggage was stolen. You only travel with what you love, so I had my Manolos, I had one Chanel suit and an old Yankees sweatshirt from the ’60s ... and all I got back was my dog dish.
Q. How did you choose which shoe in your new line to call “Carrie”?
A. There were other Carries. And it kept not feeling right. But this shoe [a T-strap heeled number in purple] is kind of a contradiction. Because there is something very feminine and ladylike about this shoe, but the purple is a little subversive. The purple is the person that chose not to wear the appropriate thing to work. And I feel that’s what Carrie was.
Q. You have become so associated with fashion. How did that all happen?
A. You know, I think that I played a character for a very long time who had an enormous amount of affection for fashion, she had this kind of relationship we’d never seen portrayed or depicted or illustrated on-screen. And also fashion was just starting to emerge at that time as a separate sort of character in New York. I think it was a confluence of playing that person, also loving [fashion] myself, and watching luxury and vintage just start to rise.
You know when we first started shooting the show, and we hadn’t been on the air yet, nobody would loan us anything. We had a very meager budget ... we were pulling mostly from consignment, some rental houses, borrowing from friends, or from emerging designers.
And the show went on the air, and someone was talking about fashion, and looking at fashion in a way that had never happened before. And the business was just starting to shift. And nobody had dressed [like Carrie]. Nobody was wearing an old raggedy beat-up fur coat that was 40 bucks with a Fendi baguette [a luxury bag that costs about $1,500]. It was just a whole new way of thinking about fashion .
Q. So speaking of timing — where do you stand on a third movie?
A. There is no conversation about doing a third movie. As Michael [Patrick King, the writer/director] has said, I think recently, he and I both know what the last part of the story is. None of the other women know. But I trust Michael’s sense of timing. I don’t know that the time will ever be right to tell it. So there are no plans. But I do know, and Michael knows, what that third story would be. And it’s small, but mighty.